- className instproc methodName ?non-pos-args? args body ?assertions + className instproc methodName ?non-pos-args? args body ?assertions objName proc methodName ?non-pos-args? args body ?assertions
@@ -1821,7 +1821,7 @@
Object o
- o proc y {-a {-b {1 2 3}}} {x y} {
+ o proc y {-a {-b {1 2 3}} x y} {
puts "$a $b $x $y"
}
@@ -1839,10 +1839,10 @@
o y -a 1 3 4
- The ordinary arguments start after the last non-positional argument (here: "3 4"). We can explicitly end the non-positional arguments by -using "--". This is useful if we want to provide arguments that contain dashes ("-"), e.g.: +using "--". This is useful if we want to provide arguments that contain +dashes ("-"), e.g.:
o y -a 1 -- -b -c
@@ -1858,7 +1858,7 @@
Class P
- P instproc y {-a:required {-b:boolean {true}}} {} {
+ P instproc y {-a:required {-b:boolean true}} {
puts "$a $b"
}
P p
@@ -1877,11 +1877,11 @@
p y -b " a b v"
-
The checkoptions are extensible. In fact, they are defined in an
-object "xotcl::nonPosArgs". We can extend this object with new
-methods and we can provide other checkobjects. A check option method
-has the following syntax:
+object "::xotcl::nonposArgs". We can extend this object with new
+methods.
+
+A check option method has the following syntax:
object|class proc|instproc methodName {?optional arguments argName args} {
@@ -1905,7 +1905,7 @@
checking the options. This can be done at any place in the checkoption
list. The following example defines new checkoptions in a separate
object and switches to this object for checking. Then the check is
-switched back to "xotcl::nonPosArgs" to invoke the predefined option
+switched back to "xotcl::nonposArgs" to invoke the predefined option
"required":
@@ -1917,7 +1917,7 @@
colorchecker proc reddish {argName args} {
puts "reddish"
}
-o proc color {{{-color:checkobj colorchecker,color must be red,reddish,checkobj xotcl::nonPosArgs, required} red}} {} {
+o proc color {{{-color:checkobj colorchecker,color must be red,reddish,checkobj xotcl::nonposArgs, required} red}} {} {
puts "$b $arg"
}