Index: openacs-4/packages/assessment/www/doc/as_items.adp =================================================================== RCS file: /usr/local/cvsroot/openacs-4/packages/assessment/www/doc/as_items.adp,v diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- openacs-4/packages/assessment/www/doc/as_items.adp 7 Aug 2017 23:48:04 -0000 1.2 +++ openacs-4/packages/assessment/www/doc/as_items.adp 25 Jan 2018 12:18:49 -0000 1.3 @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
Categorization and internationalization will make it into OpenACS 5.2, therefore we are not dealing with it -in Assessment seperately but use the (to be) built in functionality +in Assessment separately but use the (to be) built in functionality of OpenACS 5.2
Additionally we have support functionality for an as_item. This includes the help functionality. To give @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ text
If the Assessment Package is installed and mounted, the link can be follow and will lead to a page that shows all the assessment that can be responded for anonymous users created in all of the -diferent instances of the assessment package that could exist. If +different instances of the assessment package that could exist. If the option "None" is selected, it means that the registration process will be the same as always has been, if any other option is selected, the assessment will be diplayed when a Index: openacs-4/packages/assessment/www/doc/user_interface/assessment_creation.adp =================================================================== RCS file: /usr/local/cvsroot/openacs-4/packages/assessment/www/doc/user_interface/assessment_creation.adp,v diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- openacs-4/packages/assessment/www/doc/user_interface/assessment_creation.adp 7 Aug 2017 23:48:04 -0000 1.2 +++ openacs-4/packages/assessment/www/doc/user_interface/assessment_creation.adp 25 Jan 2018 12:18:49 -0000 1.3 @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ least one of the checkboxes mentioned below has to be selected.
The backend for the test processing, that -enables the automatic tests is described in a seperate document as it will be parsed while +enables the automatic tests is described in a separate document as it will be parsed while the respondee answers the test, not manually. In addition this document describes how the grades are calculated (automatically or manually) for each question. The result is beeing stored in the @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ provide a very flexible way of adding scores into the system, either automatically (as described above) or manually (e.g. this student did a good oral exam). -
In addition to the possiblity to enter
+ In addition to the possibility to enter
scores/rates, the grading package allows for automatic aggregation
of scores. This holds especially true for tests and classes. A test
result will depend on the result of all the answers (aggregated). A
@@ -86,10 +86,10 @@
gets the name from I'd say ;). Grading schemes are flexible and
can be created on the fly. This allows us to support any grading
scheme across the world's universities. In addition in the area
-of Knowledge Management, grades could be transfered into incentive
+of Knowledge Management, grades could be transferred into incentive
points, that can be reused to reward employees for good work done
(where they got good ratings for). Last but not least, maybe embeded with the
+ Last but not least, maybe embedded with the
workflow system, is the possibility to execute actions based on the
grade. An example would be the adding of the student to the
advanced class if his grade or score reaches a certain level.
@@ -121,17 +121,17 @@
"change basic information" as one assessment among
many. With a little bit of tweaking and the
-possiblity to add instant gratification, aka aggregated result
+possibility to add instant gratification, aka aggregated result
display, it could include the poll package and make it
redundant. Last but not least with the ability to
display questions in a multi dimensional way to the user, the
-assessment system is usefull for quality assurance (how important
+assessment system is useful for quality assurance (how important
is this feature / how good do you think we implemented it). And as
you might have guessed, for anything the current survey module has
been used for as well (e.g. plain and simple surveys). The grading system on it's own would
-be usefull for the OpenACS community as it would allow the handing
+be useful for the OpenACS community as it would allow the handing
out of "zorkmints" along with any benefits the collection
of mints gives to the users. As mentioned earlier, this is also
very important in a Knowledge Management environment, where you
Index: openacs-4/packages/assessment/www/doc/user_interface/item_creation.adp
===================================================================
RCS file: /usr/local/cvsroot/openacs-4/packages/assessment/www/doc/user_interface/item_creation.adp,v
diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
--- openacs-4/packages/assessment/www/doc/user_interface/item_creation.adp 7 Aug 2017 23:48:04 -0000 1.2
+++ openacs-4/packages/assessment/www/doc/user_interface/item_creation.adp 25 Jan 2018 12:18:49 -0000 1.3
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
question is changed.