Index: openacs-4/packages/bookmarks/sql/oracle/bookmarks-create.sql
===================================================================
RCS file: /usr/local/cvsroot/openacs-4/packages/bookmarks/sql/oracle/bookmarks-create.sql,v
diff -u -r1.6 -r1.7
--- openacs-4/packages/bookmarks/sql/oracle/bookmarks-create.sql 29 Jun 2004 10:17:47 -0000 1.6
+++ openacs-4/packages/bookmarks/sql/oracle/bookmarks-create.sql 26 May 2017 17:25:36 -0000 1.7
@@ -452,7 +452,7 @@
-- To avoid violating referential constraints we need also (at least no smarter way to
- -- do this occured to me) to delete all bookmarks on the level of the outer cursor
+ -- do this occurred to me) to delete all bookmarks on the level of the outer cursor
-- that lie under the folder to be deleted.
cursor c_bookmark_id_one_level (tree_id in integer)
is
Index: openacs-4/packages/bookmarks/sql/oracle/upgrade/upgrade-4.6.2-5.0d1.sql
===================================================================
RCS file: /usr/local/cvsroot/openacs-4/packages/bookmarks/sql/oracle/upgrade/upgrade-4.6.2-5.0d1.sql,v
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- openacs-4/packages/bookmarks/sql/oracle/upgrade/upgrade-4.6.2-5.0d1.sql 8 Oct 2003 16:40:21 -0000 1.1
+++ openacs-4/packages/bookmarks/sql/oracle/upgrade/upgrade-4.6.2-5.0d1.sql 26 May 2017 17:25:36 -0000 1.2
@@ -306,7 +306,7 @@
-- To avoid violating referential constraints we need also (at least no smarter way to
- -- do this occured to me) to delete all bookmarks on the level of the outer cursor
+ -- do this occurred to me) to delete all bookmarks on the level of the outer cursor
-- that lie under the folder to be deleted.
cursor c_bookmark_id_one_level (tree_id in integer)
is
Index: openacs-4/packages/bookmarks/www/delete-dead-links.tcl
===================================================================
RCS file: /usr/local/cvsroot/openacs-4/packages/bookmarks/www/delete-dead-links.tcl,v
diff -u -r1.6 -r1.7
--- openacs-4/packages/bookmarks/www/delete-dead-links.tcl 7 Aug 2014 07:36:55 -0000 1.6
+++ openacs-4/packages/bookmarks/www/delete-dead-links.tcl 26 May 2017 17:25:36 -0000 1.7
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@
set browsing_user_id [ad_conn user_id]
-# Loop throught the bookmark_ids to delete
+# Loop through the bookmark_ids to delete
foreach url_id $deleteable_link {
db_foreach bookmark_ids_for_url "select bookmark_id
Index: openacs-4/packages/bookmarks/www/doc/index.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /usr/local/cvsroot/openacs-4/packages/bookmarks/www/doc/index.html,v
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- openacs-4/packages/bookmarks/www/doc/index.html 20 Apr 2001 20:51:09 -0000 1.1
+++ openacs-4/packages/bookmarks/www/doc/index.html 26 May 2017 17:25:36 -0000 1.2
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@
main site and another bookmarks instance called "Sub Bookmarks" under a subsite
Added some bookmarks for George admin and verified that the
content in different instances is separated.
-Tried to add a non-existant url. A warning was issued but the
+Tried to add a non-existent url. A warning was issued but the
bookmark could still be added.
Tried adding a responding url without title. The application tries
to fetch the title from the web page.
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@
bookmarks module wihout interrupting the web browsing too much. This
is achieved by the use of a Bookmarklet (a browser bookmark that
contains Javascript). This Bookmarklet may be added to the
-browser toolbar so that everytime the user comes across a page that he
+browser toolbar so that every time the user comes across a page that he
wants to bookmark all he has to do is click on a button in the toolbar
and he is given the possibility to enter a title and choose a folder
for the bookmark whereafter he is redirected back to the web page he
Index: openacs-4/packages/bug-tracker/tcl/bug-tracker-procs.tcl
===================================================================
RCS file: /usr/local/cvsroot/openacs-4/packages/bug-tracker/tcl/bug-tracker-procs.tcl,v
diff -u -r1.51 -r1.52
--- openacs-4/packages/bug-tracker/tcl/bug-tracker-procs.tcl 8 May 2016 13:06:06 -0000 1.51
+++ openacs-4/packages/bug-tracker/tcl/bug-tracker-procs.tcl 26 May 2017 17:30:02 -0000 1.52
@@ -1309,7 +1309,7 @@
@author Peter Marklund
} {
- #manually delete all bugs to avoid wierd integrity constraints
+ #manually delete all bugs to avoid weird integrity constraints
while { [set bug_id [db_string min_bug_id {}]] > 0 } {
bug_tracker::bug::delete $bug_id
}
Index: openacs-4/packages/bug-tracker/www/doc/bug-tracker-spec.adp
===================================================================
RCS file: /usr/local/cvsroot/openacs-4/packages/bug-tracker/www/doc/bug-tracker-spec.adp,v
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- openacs-4/packages/bug-tracker/www/doc/bug-tracker-spec.adp 12 Sep 2016 06:03:05 -0000 1.1
+++ openacs-4/packages/bug-tracker/www/doc/bug-tracker-spec.adp 26 May 2017 17:30:02 -0000 1.2
@@ -130,14 +130,14 @@
go there in this version of the bug-tracker.
The RESOLUTION code to one of the following:
-- Fixed
- By design
- Won't fix
- Postponed
- Duplicate
- Not reproducable
+- Fixed
- By design
- Won't fix
- Postponed
- Duplicate
- Not reproducible
Again, BugZilla is more rigorous than most: They have an
"invalid" resolution step, with the comment "the
problem described is not a bug". I don't think we need
this -- if it's not a bug, tell us what it is: By design, not
-reproducable, or some other reason?
+reproducible, or some other reason?
Other Bug Classifications
Type of bug (hard-coded)
Index: openacs-4/packages/bug-tracker/www/doc/bug-tracker-spec.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /usr/local/cvsroot/openacs-4/packages/bug-tracker/www/doc/bug-tracker-spec.html,v
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- openacs-4/packages/bug-tracker/www/doc/bug-tracker-spec.html 24 Sep 2002 08:36:39 -0000 1.1
+++ openacs-4/packages/bug-tracker/www/doc/bug-tracker-spec.html 26 May 2017 17:30:02 -0000 1.2
@@ -199,13 +199,13 @@
- Won't fix
- Postponed
- Duplicate
-
- Not reproducable
+
- Not reproducible
Again, BugZilla is more rigorous than most: They have an "invalid"
resolution step, with the comment "the problem described is not a
bug". I don't think we need this -- if it's not a bug, tell us what it
-is: By design, not reproducable, or some other reason?
+is: By design, not reproducible, or some other reason?
Other Bug Classifications