Index: openacs-4/packages/bug-tracker/www/doc/bug-tracker-spec.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /usr/local/cvsroot/openacs-4/packages/bug-tracker/www/doc/bug-tracker-spec.html,v
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- openacs-4/packages/bug-tracker/www/doc/bug-tracker-spec.html	24 Sep 2002 08:36:39 -0000	1.1
+++ openacs-4/packages/bug-tracker/www/doc/bug-tracker-spec.html	26 May 2017 17:30:02 -0000	1.2
@@ -199,13 +199,13 @@
 <li>Won't fix
 <li>Postponed
 <li>Duplicate
-<li>Not reproducable
+<li>Not reproducible
 </ul>
 
 Again, BugZilla is more rigorous than most: They have an "invalid"
 resolution step, with the comment "the problem described is not a
 bug". I don't think we need this -- if it's not a bug, tell us what it
-is: By design, not reproducable, or some other reason?
+is: By design, not reproducible, or some other reason?
 
 
 <h3>Other Bug Classifications</h3>