Index: openacs-4/packages/acs-templating/www/doc/timing.html =================================================================== RCS file: /usr/local/cvsroot/openacs-4/packages/acs-templating/www/doc/timing.html,v diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- openacs-4/packages/acs-templating/www/doc/timing.html 13 Mar 2001 22:59:27 -0000 1.1 +++ openacs-4/packages/acs-templating/www/doc/timing.html 27 Oct 2014 16:40:15 -0000 1.2 @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@
The Templating System must not cause any performance problems to a site. It must be fast and efficient, and it must not slow down - page load speed by more than 10% versus a TCL page with inline + page load speed by more than 10% versus a Tcl page with inline HTML.
@@ -40,10 +40,10 @@RefreshCache
in section
template
can be set to always
or
never
to affect the cacheing strategy; the latter
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@
dev0103-001:/home/brech/prog/tcl/timing.tcl
,
which generates the directories stage00
to
stage14
and the ten files
@@ -233,9 +233,9 @@
On reusia.boston, we had a much better performance of the
request processor. The processing times of the pages proper
(stage 10 before, 11 now) didn't change much; we just got
- clearer results. The total processing time of TCL-only pages is
+ clearer results. The total processing time of Tcl-only pages is
around 155ms, while templated pages take around 220ms, that is
- 42% longer (or TCL-only pages take 30% less).
+ 42% longer (or Tcl-only pages take 30% less).
Relative times depend on the other components of the pipeline. @@ -244,7 +244,7 @@ request processor) were slower, this wasn't that noticeable.
- For ACS 3.4, TCL-only chain-frac-0 pages take 115ms, where the + For ACS 3.4, Tcl-only chain-frac-0 pages take 115ms, where the templated versisons are much slower, 320ms for chain-frac-1 and 340 for -2.