When using AOLserver, remember that there are effectively two types of global namespace, not one:

The Tcl built-in command global accesses script-global, not server-global, variables from within a procedure. This distinction is important to understand in order to use global correctly when programming AOLserver.

Also, AOLserver purges all script-global variables in a thread (i.e., Tcl interpreter) between HTTP requests. If it didn't, that would affect (and complicate) our use of script-global variables dramatically, which would then be better described as thread-global variables. Given AOLserver's behavior, however, "script-global" is a more appropriate term.

ns_schedule_proc and ad_schedule_proc each take a -thread flag to cause a scheduled procedure to run asychronously, in its own thread. It almost always seems like a good idea to specify this switch, but there's a problem.

It turns out that whenever a task scheduled with ns_schedule_proc -thread or ad_schedule_proc -thread t is run, AOLserver creates a brand new thread and a brand new interpreter, and reinitializes the procedure table (essentially, loads all procedures that were created during server initialization into the new interpreter). This happens every time the task is executed - and it is a very expensive process that should not be taken lightly!

The moral: if you have a lightweight scheduled procedure which runs frequently, don't use the -thread switch.

The return command in Tcl returns control to the caller procedure. This definition allows nested procedures to work properly. However, this definition also means that nested procedures cannot use return to end an entire thread. This situation is most common in exception conditions that can be triggered from inside a procedure e.g., a permission denied exception. At this point, the procedure that detects invalid permission wants to write an error message to the user, and completely abort execution of the caller thread. return doesn't work, because the procedure may be nested several levels deep. We therefore use ad_script_abort to abort the remainder of the thread. Note that using return instead of ad_script_abort may raise some security issues: an attacker could call a page that performed some DML statement, pass in some arguments, and get a permission denied error -- but the DML statement would still be executed because the thread was not stopped. Note that return -code return can be used in circumstances where the procedure will only be called from two levels deep.

Many functions have a single return value. For instance, util_email_valid_p returns a number: 1 or 0. Other functions need to return a composite value. For instance, consider a function that looks up a user's name and email address, given an ID. One way to implement this is to return a three-element list and document that the first element contains the name, and the second contains the email address. The problem with this technique is that, because Tcl does not support constants, calling procedures that returns lists in this way necessitates the use of magic numbers, e.g.:

set user_info [ad_get_user_info $user_id]
set first_name [lindex $user_info 0]
set email [lindex $user_info 1]

AOLserver/Tcl generally has three mechanisms that we like, for returning more than one value from a function. When to use which depends on the circumstances.

Using Arrays and Pass-By-Value

The one we generally prefer is returning an array get-formatted list. It has all the nice properties of pass-by-value, and it uses Tcl arrays, which have good native support.

ad_proc ad_get_user_info { user_id } {
    db_1row user_info { select first_names, last_name, email from users where user_id = :user_id }
    return [list \
        name "$first_names $last_name" \
    email $email \
    namelink "<a href=\"/shared/community-member?user_id=[ns_urlencode $user_id]\">$first_names $last_name</a>" \
    emaillink "<a href=\"mailto:$email\">$email</a>"]
}

array set user_info [ad_get_user_info $user_id]

doc_body_append "$user_info(namelink) ($user_info(emaillink))"

You could also have done this by using an array internally and using array get:

ad_proc ad_get_user_info { user_id } {
    db_1row user_info { select first_names, last_name, email from users where user_id = :user_id }
    set user_info(name) "$first_names $last_name"
    set user_info(email) $email
    set user_info(namelink) "<a href=\"/shared/community-member?user_id=[ns_urlencode $user_id]\">$first_names $last_name</a>"
    set user_info(emaillink) "<a href=\"mailto:$email\">$email</a>"
    return [array get user_info]
}

Using Arrays and Pass-By-Reference

Sometimes pass-by-value incurs too much overhead, and you'd rather pass-by-reference. Specifically, if you're writing a proc that uses arrays internally to build up some value, there are many entries in the array, and you're planning on iterating over the proc many times. In this case, pass-by-value is expensive, and you'd use pass-by-reference.

You implement pass-by-reference in Tcl by taking the name of an array as an argument and upvar it.

ad_proc ad_get_user_info { 
    -array:required
    user_id 
} {
    upvar $array user_info
    db_1row user_info { select first_names, last_name, email from users where user_id = :user_id }
    set user_info(name) "$first_names $last_name"
    set user_info(email) $email
    set user_info(namelink) "<a href=\"/shared/community-member?user_id=[ns_urlencode $user_id]\">$first_names $last_name</a>"
    set user_info(emaillink) "<a href=\"mailto:$email\">$email</a>"
}

ad_get_user_info -array user_info $user_id

doc_body_append "$user_info(namelink) ($user_info(emaillink))"

We prefer pass-by-value over pass-by-reference. Pass-by-reference makes the code harder to read and debug, because changing a value in one place has side effects in other places. Especially if have a chain of upvars through several layers of the call stack, you'll have a hard time debugging.

Multisets: Using ns_sets and Pass-By-Reference

An array is a type of set, which means you can't have multiple entries with the same key. Data structures that can have multiple entries for the same key are known as a multiset or bag.

If your data can have multiple entries with the same key, you should use the AOLserver built-in ns_set. You can also do a case-insensitive lookup on an ns_set, something you can't easily do on an array. This is especially useful for things like HTTP headers, which happen to have these exact properties.

You always use pass-by-reference with ns_sets, since they don't have any built-in way of generating and reconstructing themselves from a string representation. Instead, you pass the handle to the set.

ad_proc ad_get_user_info {
    -set:required
    user_id
} {
    db_1row user_info { select first_names, last_name, email from users where user_id = :user_id }
    ns_set put $set name "$first_names $last_name"
    ns_set put $set email $email
    ns_set put $set namelink "<a href=\"/shared/community-member?user_id=[ns_urlencode $user_id]\">$first_names $last_name</a>"
    ns_set put $set emaillink "<a href=\"mailto:$email\">$email</a>"
}

set user_info [ns_set create]
ad_get_user_info -set $user_info $user_id

doc_body_append "[ns_set get $user_info namelink] ([ns_set get $user_info emaillink])"

We don't recommend ns_set as a general mechanism for passing sets (as opposed to multisets) of data. Not only do they inherently use pass-by-reference, which we dis-like, they're also somewhat clumsy to use, since Tcl doesn't have built-in syntactic support for them.

Consider for example a loop over the entries in a ns_set as compared to an array:

# ns_set variant
set size [ns_set size $myset]
for { set i 0 } { $i < $size } { incr i } {
    puts "[ns_set key $myset $i] = [ns_set value $myset $i]"
}

# array variant
foreach name [array names myarray] {
    puts "$myarray($name) = $myarray($name)"
}

And this example of constructing a value:

# ns_set variant
set myset [ns_set create]
ns_set put $myset foo $foo
ns_set put $myset baz $baz
return $myset

# array variant
return [list
    foo $foo
    baz $baz
]

ns_sets are designed to be lightweight, so memory consumption should not be a problem. However, when using ns_set get to perform lookup by name, they perform a linear lookup, whereas arrays use a hash table, so ns_sets are slower than arrays when the number of entries is large.