Very Short Introduction to IMS LD
IMS Learning Design (very short introduction)
IMS Learning Design (from now on referred as IMS LD) is a
specification done by the IMS Global Learning Consortium. It is an
XML-based description for e-learning. It provides a global framework for
including the description of different pedagogical and methodological
learning models. Therefore IMS LD is independent from a concrete pedagogy
or methodology.
The XML file that is compliant with IMS LD specifies a set of
learning activities (which are usually related to a set of resources and
services) and who and when can do these activities and with which
conditions. Therefore, it establishes a sequencing of activities for each
role. IMS LD is in principle independent from IMS Content
Packaging (IMS CP), so it can be used without IMS CP.
Nevertheless, the most common case is to insert the IMS LD file inside the
organizations element of an IMS CP and the result is called "unit of
learning". A unit of learning, as defined in the IMS LD specification, is
an abstract term used to refer to any delimited piece of education or
training, such as a course, a module, a lesson, etc. In this
specification, the terms unit of learning and course are used to represent
the same thing: a collection of ordered activities which has associated
resources and services to learn that are going to be delivered to
different defined roles and the workflow of the activities.
Unit of learning and IMS Learning Design are not the same thing. A
learning design is a description of a learning method used to achieve
certain goals (learning objectives), and a unit of learning is the result
of packaging a learning design (for example using IMS CP). There are some
other terms introduced by IMS LD that need to be defined, which are
briefly explained bellow:
Prerequisites. The previous
requirements for learners for doing the unit of learning.
Objectives: They are the goals
to obtain in a unit of learning. Also it is possible to write
objectives for each particular activity.
Components. It defines
statically the following elements of a unit of learning: roles,
activities, environments and properties
Roles. It defines the different
types of users in a unit of learning. There are two basic types of
roles: Learner and Staff. But additional roles can be defined. The
roles form a hierarchical graph where the root roles are the basic
ones. For example inside Learner role we can have additional roles
depending on the students level or inside the staff role we can have
professors, teaching assisstants, tutors, etc. .LRN. in fact, has
defined predefined roles, so the sutdent role will be linked to the
Learner one and the proffessor, teaching assisstant, etc. can be
mapped to the IMS LD corresponding ones. When there is no an exact
correspondence, then we will create new .LRN subgroups that match with
the IMS LD roles.
Properties. This is something
that defines a concrete feature. There are local properties ,
local-person properties, local-role properties, global-personal
properties and global properties. They are used depending on the scope
of the property.
Activities. An activity is
something to be done, that usually has a description and an
enviroment. There are two types of activities: learning activities
(activities that are done by students in order to learn) and support
activities (activities to support or help students, usually done by
professors). Also there are structure activities which are an union of
several activities that can be presented to the student either in a
sequencial mode or for the user to select. The activities are the core
of the workflow of the learning design.
Environment. Collection of
learning objects (for example files to be viewed by the student),
services (like foros, chat, etc.) and sub-environments, in wich
activities take place. When a student has to complete an activity that
have a concrete enviroment, then he/she can do whichever of the
learning objects and services that are defined inside this
enviroment
Service. For instance, a
discussion forum, email, conference service and monitor service (to
look at the properties).
Method. It defines the dinamic
part of learning design. It consists of several plays and contitions.
If a method has several plays then each play is executed in parallel
for all the roles. Therefore, for example a Learner can select in an
instant of time between the different parallel activities (one
activity for each play)
Play A play has a set of acts.
Each act is not executed until the previous one has been executed.
Therefore, it can be viewed as a sequence of acts. A play finishes
when all its acts has finished
Act It defines what activity to
do for each of role. Each role make the activity in parallel respect
to the rest of roles. An act is finished when all the roles have
finished its activity. This provides a synchronization point.
Conditions. They are used in
conjunction with properties to further refinement and to add
personalization facilities in the learning design. By these way, for
example is possible to take decissions taken into account the user
profile, assessments done by the student, selections of the students
during the course, etc.
Notification. Allows to send
messages between roles or to assign new learning or support activities
to roles based on certain events. When integrating IMS LD with .LRN,
we take advantage of this capability in order to send messages between
the system's components. This can only be done if .LRN is fully aware
of the learner status inside the course.
Item. When a component, a
learning objective, or a prerequisite needs a resource, an item
element is used. The learning design provides a semantic context for
these items, so that runtime systems can know what to do with the
resource.
Levels A, B and C
There are tree levels of complaint in the IMS LD
specification:
Learning Design Level A includes everything
described above except the conditions, properties and notifications.
It thus contains all the core vocabulary needed to support dedagogical
diversity.
Learning Design Level B adds Properties and
Conditions to level A, which enable personalization and more elaborate
sequencing and interactions based on learner porfolios. It can be used
to direct the learning activities as well as record outcomes.
Learning Design Level C adds Notification
to level B, which, although a fairly small addition to the
specification, adds significantly to the capability.
There is a IMS
Learning Design XML Binding document, where you can find detailed
information about how each one of the elements described above is mapped
in the final xml file.