Index: openacs-4/packages/assessment/www/doc/requirements.adp
===================================================================
RCS file: /usr/local/cvsroot/openacs-4/packages/assessment/www/doc/requirements.adp,v
diff -u -N -r1.2 -r1.3
--- openacs-4/packages/assessment/www/doc/requirements.adp	7 Aug 2017 23:48:04 -0000	1.2
+++ openacs-4/packages/assessment/www/doc/requirements.adp	25 Jan 2018 12:18:49 -0000	1.3
@@ -246,10 +246,10 @@
 The exam consists of 3 sections. The exam is passed, if the student
 achieves at least 50% total score. In addition the student has to
 achive at least 40% in each of the sections. The first section is
-deemed more important, therefore it gets a weigth of 40%, the other
+deemed more important, therefore it gets a weight of 40%, the other
 two sections only 30% towards the total score. Each section
-consists of multiple questions that have a different weigth (in
-percent) for the total score of the section. The sum of the weigths
+consists of multiple questions that have a different weight (in
+percent) for the total score of the section. The sum of the weights
 has to be 100%, otherwise the author of the section get's a
 warning. Some of the questions are multiple choice questions, that
 get different percentages for each answer. As the computer science
@@ -488,7 +488,7 @@
 support and have varying levels of importance in different
 contexts. Consider:</p><ul>
 <li>Questions may have a "correct" answer against which a
-subject&#39;s reponse should be compared, yielding some measure of
+subject&#39;s response should be compared, yielding some measure of
 a "score" for that question varying from completely
 "wrong" to completely "correct". The package
 should allow Editors to specify the nature of the scoring continuum